Home / Technologies / instant.page vs vanilla-lazyload
instant.page vs vanilla-lazyload: who uses which
instant.page is on more sites: 63,607 against 44,884 for vanilla-lazyload, about 1.4 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | instant.page | vanilla-lazyload |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 32,102 | 20,712 |
| .ru on .ru | 356 | 3,400 |
| .org on .org | 1,836 | 986 |
| .uk in the UK | 1,788 | 957 |
| .ch in Switzerland | 2,527 | 217 |
| .de in Germany | 1,646 | 885 |
| .net on .net | 1,542 | 954 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 1,118 | 841 |
678 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, instant.page or vanilla-lazyload?
instant.page is on more sites: 63,607 against 44,884 for vanilla-lazyload, about 1.4 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use instant.page and vanilla-lazyload together?
678 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using instant.page or vanilla-lazyload as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.