Home / Technologies / Integral Ad Science vs X (Twitter) Pixel
Integral Ad Science vs X (Twitter) Pixel: who uses which
X (Twitter) Pixel is on more sites: 23,918 against 1,159 for Integral Ad Science, about 20.6 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Integral Ad Science | X (Twitter) Pixel |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 400 | 11,947 |
| .tv on .tv | 0 | 2,176 |
| .org on .org | 45 | 1,373 |
| .jp in Japan | 6 | 1,057 |
| .uk in the UK | 111 | 521 |
| .net on .net | 17 | 455 |
| .io on .io | 2 | 441 |
| .ai on .ai | 0 | 418 |
1 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Integral Ad Science or X (Twitter) Pixel?
X (Twitter) Pixel is on more sites: 23,918 against 1,159 for Integral Ad Science, about 20.6 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Integral Ad Science and X (Twitter) Pixel together?
1 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Integral Ad Science or X (Twitter) Pixel as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.