Home / Technologies / intl-tel-input vs Jarallax
intl-tel-input vs Jarallax: who uses which
intl-tel-input is on more sites: 427,438 against 284,348 for Jarallax, about 1.5 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | intl-tel-input | Jarallax |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 241,271 | 129,749 |
| .de in Germany | 14,251 | 16,013 |
| .org on .org | 14,730 | 11,229 |
| .fr in France | 8,355 | 10,653 |
| .in in India | 11,664 | 6,251 |
| .uk in the UK | 11,279 | 6,051 |
| .it in Italy | 5,695 | 8,718 |
| .br in Brazil | 4,921 | 8,657 |
9,308 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, intl-tel-input or Jarallax?
intl-tel-input is on more sites: 427,438 against 284,348 for Jarallax, about 1.5 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use intl-tel-input and Jarallax together?
9,308 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using intl-tel-input or Jarallax as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.