Home / Technologies / intl-tel-input vs jQuery Migrate
intl-tel-input vs jQuery Migrate: who uses which
jQuery Migrate is on more sites: 10,479,781 against 427,438 for intl-tel-input, about 24.5 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | intl-tel-input | jQuery Migrate |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 241,271 | 4,393,843 |
| .de in Germany | 14,251 | 758,077 |
| .org on .org | 14,730 | 464,402 |
| .fr in France | 8,355 | 315,453 |
| .uk in the UK | 11,279 | 291,468 |
| .it in Italy | 5,695 | 287,185 |
| .net on .net | 8,615 | 243,800 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 5,191 | 243,459 |
191,051 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, intl-tel-input or jQuery Migrate?
jQuery Migrate is on more sites: 10,479,781 against 427,438 for intl-tel-input, about 24.5 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use intl-tel-input and jQuery Migrate together?
191,051 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using intl-tel-input or jQuery Migrate as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.