Home / Technologies / intl-tel-input vs lazysizes
intl-tel-input vs lazysizes: who uses which
lazysizes is on more sites: 932,496 against 427,438 for intl-tel-input, about 2.2 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | intl-tel-input | lazysizes |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 241,271 | 472,701 |
| .de in Germany | 14,251 | 50,865 |
| .ru on .ru | 5,973 | 34,044 |
| .org on .org | 14,730 | 25,003 |
| .jp in Japan | 355 | 35,838 |
| .uk in the UK | 11,279 | 22,214 |
| .net on .net | 8,615 | 22,755 |
| .fr in France | 8,355 | 15,629 |
13,372 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, intl-tel-input or lazysizes?
lazysizes is on more sites: 932,496 against 427,438 for intl-tel-input, about 2.2 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use intl-tel-input and lazysizes together?
13,372 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using intl-tel-input or lazysizes as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.