Home / Technologies / intl-tel-input vs particles.js
intl-tel-input vs particles.js: who uses which
intl-tel-input is on more sites: 427,438 against 74,453 for particles.js, about 5.7 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | intl-tel-input | particles.js |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 241,271 | 33,280 |
| .de in Germany | 14,251 | 3,460 |
| .org on .org | 14,730 | 2,745 |
| .in in India | 11,664 | 1,458 |
| .uk in the UK | 11,279 | 1,605 |
| .fr in France | 8,355 | 1,894 |
| .net on .net | 8,615 | 1,556 |
| .au in Australia | 8,090 | 972 |
2,289 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, intl-tel-input or particles.js?
intl-tel-input is on more sites: 427,438 against 74,453 for particles.js, about 5.7 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use intl-tel-input and particles.js together?
2,289 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using intl-tel-input or particles.js as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.