Home / Technologies / intl-tel-input vs PDF.js
intl-tel-input vs PDF.js: who uses which
intl-tel-input is on more sites: 427,438 against 13,048 for PDF.js, about 32.8 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | intl-tel-input | PDF.js |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 241,271 | 4,907 |
| .org on .org | 14,730 | 875 |
| .de in Germany | 14,251 | 828 |
| .in in India | 11,664 | 203 |
| .uk in the UK | 11,279 | 211 |
| .net on .net | 8,615 | 266 |
| .fr in France | 8,355 | 384 |
| .au in Australia | 8,090 | 118 |
280 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, intl-tel-input or PDF.js?
intl-tel-input is on more sites: 427,438 against 13,048 for PDF.js, about 32.8 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use intl-tel-input and PDF.js together?
280 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using intl-tel-input or PDF.js as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.