Home / Technologies / intl-tel-input vs Turbolinks
intl-tel-input vs Turbolinks: who uses which
intl-tel-input is on more sites: 427,438 against 32,637 for Turbolinks, about 13.1 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | intl-tel-input | Turbolinks |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 241,271 | 16,528 |
| .org on .org | 14,730 | 2,993 |
| .de in Germany | 14,251 | 816 |
| .in in India | 11,664 | 224 |
| .uk in the UK | 11,279 | 444 |
| .net on .net | 8,615 | 757 |
| .fr in France | 8,355 | 352 |
| .au in Australia | 8,090 | 289 |
3,417 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, intl-tel-input or Turbolinks?
intl-tel-input is on more sites: 427,438 against 32,637 for Turbolinks, about 13.1 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use intl-tel-input and Turbolinks together?
3,417 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using intl-tel-input or Turbolinks as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.