Home / Technologies / intl-tel-input vs VenoBox
intl-tel-input vs VenoBox: who uses which
intl-tel-input is on more sites: 427,438 against 42,064 for VenoBox, about 10.2 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | intl-tel-input | VenoBox |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 241,271 | 21,015 |
| .org on .org | 14,730 | 1,483 |
| .de in Germany | 14,251 | 1,322 |
| .in in India | 11,664 | 918 |
| .uk in the UK | 11,279 | 1,122 |
| .net on .net | 8,615 | 774 |
| .fr in France | 8,355 | 569 |
| .au in Australia | 8,090 | 557 |
686 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, intl-tel-input or VenoBox?
intl-tel-input is on more sites: 427,438 against 42,064 for VenoBox, about 10.2 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use intl-tel-input and VenoBox together?
686 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using intl-tel-input or VenoBox as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.