Home / Technologies / intl-tel-input vs Webpack
intl-tel-input vs Webpack: who uses which
Webpack is on more sites: 2,756,820 against 427,438 for intl-tel-input, about 6.4 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | intl-tel-input | Webpack |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 241,271 | 1,781,021 |
| .org on .org | 14,730 | 169,050 |
| .uk in the UK | 11,279 | 120,575 |
| .de in Germany | 14,251 | 66,965 |
| .net on .net | 8,615 | 66,266 |
| .au in Australia | 8,090 | 52,797 |
| .ca in Canada | 5,330 | 46,584 |
| .br in Brazil | 4,921 | 40,740 |
258 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, intl-tel-input or Webpack?
Webpack is on more sites: 2,756,820 against 427,438 for intl-tel-input, about 6.4 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use intl-tel-input and Webpack together?
258 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using intl-tel-input or Webpack as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.