Home / Technologies / Intro.js vs JSFiddle Embed
Intro.js vs JSFiddle Embed: who uses which
Intro.js is on more sites: 3,450 against 33 for JSFiddle Embed, about 104.5 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Intro.js | JSFiddle Embed |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 1,350 | 17 |
| .org on .org | 484 | 3 |
| .ca in Canada | 137 | 0 |
| .br in Brazil | 106 | 0 |
| .net on .net | 69 | 1 |
| .de in Germany | 66 | 0 |
| .uk in the UK | 62 | 0 |
| .fr in France | 56 | 0 |
0 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Intro.js or JSFiddle Embed?
Intro.js is on more sites: 3,450 against 33 for JSFiddle Embed, about 104.5 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Intro.js and JSFiddle Embed together?
0 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Intro.js or JSFiddle Embed as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.