Home / Technologies / Intro.js vs Matterport
Intro.js vs Matterport: who uses which
Matterport is on more sites: 3,834 against 3,450 for Intro.js, about 1.1 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Intro.js | Matterport |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 1,350 | 1,989 |
| .org on .org | 484 | 58 |
| .de in Germany | 66 | 252 |
| .ca in Canada | 137 | 72 |
| .uk in the UK | 62 | 146 |
| .cz in Czechia | 8 | 143 |
| .br in Brazil | 106 | 33 |
| .fr in France | 56 | 82 |
0 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Intro.js or Matterport?
Matterport is on more sites: 3,834 against 3,450 for Intro.js, about 1.1 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Intro.js and Matterport together?
0 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Intro.js or Matterport as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.