Home / Technologies / Intro.js vs Microsoft Translator Widget
Intro.js vs Microsoft Translator Widget: who uses which
Intro.js is on more sites: 3,450 against 1,382 for Microsoft Translator Widget, about 2.5 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Intro.js | Microsoft Translator Widget |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 1,350 | 597 |
| .org on .org | 484 | 43 |
| .de in Germany | 66 | 95 |
| .ru on .ru | 39 | 108 |
| .ca in Canada | 137 | 9 |
| .br in Brazil | 106 | 10 |
| .it in Italy | 38 | 73 |
| .net on .net | 69 | 34 |
0 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Intro.js or Microsoft Translator Widget?
Intro.js is on more sites: 3,450 against 1,382 for Microsoft Translator Widget, about 2.5 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Intro.js and Microsoft Translator Widget together?
0 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Intro.js or Microsoft Translator Widget as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.