Home / Technologies / Intro.js vs Shepherd.js
Intro.js vs Shepherd.js: who uses which
Intro.js is on more sites: 3,450 against 741 for Shepherd.js, about 4.7 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Intro.js | Shepherd.js |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 1,350 | 294 |
| .org on .org | 484 | 43 |
| .ca in Canada | 137 | 7 |
| .br in Brazil | 106 | 28 |
| .de in Germany | 66 | 34 |
| .uk in the UK | 62 | 28 |
| .net on .net | 69 | 16 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 30 | 36 |
4 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Intro.js or Shepherd.js?
Intro.js is on more sites: 3,450 against 741 for Shepherd.js, about 4.7 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Intro.js and Shepherd.js together?
4 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Intro.js or Shepherd.js as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.