Home / Technologies / Isotope vs lazysizes
Isotope vs lazysizes: who uses which
lazysizes is on more sites: 932,496 against 846,084 for Isotope, about 1.1 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Isotope | lazysizes |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 364,875 | 472,701 |
| .de in Germany | 51,018 | 50,865 |
| .org on .org | 31,858 | 25,003 |
| .it in Italy | 33,731 | 14,575 |
| .ru on .ru | 11,058 | 34,044 |
| .uk in the UK | 20,759 | 22,214 |
| .fr in France | 24,909 | 15,629 |
| .jp in Japan | 3,498 | 35,838 |
29,297 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Isotope or lazysizes?
lazysizes is on more sites: 932,496 against 846,084 for Isotope, about 1.1 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Isotope and lazysizes together?
29,297 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Isotope or lazysizes as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.