Home / Technologies / Jarallax vs particles.js
Jarallax vs particles.js: who uses which
Jarallax is on more sites: 284,348 against 74,453 for particles.js, about 3.8 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Jarallax | particles.js |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 129,749 | 33,280 |
| .de in Germany | 16,013 | 3,460 |
| .org on .org | 11,229 | 2,745 |
| .fr in France | 10,653 | 1,894 |
| .it in Italy | 8,718 | 1,730 |
| .br in Brazil | 8,657 | 1,746 |
| .in in India | 6,251 | 1,458 |
| .uk in the UK | 6,051 | 1,605 |
14,295 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Jarallax or particles.js?
Jarallax is on more sites: 284,348 against 74,453 for particles.js, about 3.8 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Jarallax and particles.js together?
14,295 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Jarallax or particles.js as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.