Home / Technologies / Jarallax vs Slick
Jarallax vs Slick: who uses which
Slick is on more sites: 1,811,047 against 284,348 for Jarallax, about 6.4 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Jarallax | Slick |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 129,749 | 795,050 |
| .jp in Japan | 700 | 94,724 |
| .de in Germany | 16,013 | 67,754 |
| .org on .org | 11,229 | 61,699 |
| .ru on .ru | 3,960 | 65,489 |
| .uk in the UK | 6,051 | 49,954 |
| .fr in France | 10,653 | 42,709 |
| .net on .net | 4,957 | 42,812 |
54,781 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Jarallax or Slick?
Slick is on more sites: 1,811,047 against 284,348 for Jarallax, about 6.4 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Jarallax and Slick together?
54,781 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Jarallax or Slick as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.