Home / Technologies / Jarallax vs Socket.IO
Jarallax vs Socket.IO: who uses which
Jarallax is on more sites: 284,348 against 11,013 for Socket.IO, about 25.8 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Jarallax | Socket.IO |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 129,749 | 4,748 |
| .de in Germany | 16,013 | 137 |
| .org on .org | 11,229 | 376 |
| .fr in France | 10,653 | 96 |
| .br in Brazil | 8,657 | 740 |
| .it in Italy | 8,718 | 86 |
| .in in India | 6,251 | 176 |
| .uk in the UK | 6,051 | 68 |
35 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Jarallax or Socket.IO?
Jarallax is on more sites: 284,348 against 11,013 for Socket.IO, about 25.8 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Jarallax and Socket.IO together?
35 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Jarallax or Socket.IO as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.