Home / Technologies / Jarallax vs vanilla-lazyload
Jarallax vs vanilla-lazyload: who uses which
Jarallax is on more sites: 284,348 against 44,884 for vanilla-lazyload, about 6.3 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Jarallax | vanilla-lazyload |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 129,749 | 20,712 |
| .de in Germany | 16,013 | 885 |
| .org on .org | 11,229 | 986 |
| .fr in France | 10,653 | 740 |
| .it in Italy | 8,718 | 504 |
| .br in Brazil | 8,657 | 303 |
| .ru on .ru | 3,960 | 3,400 |
| .uk in the UK | 6,051 | 957 |
546 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Jarallax or vanilla-lazyload?
Jarallax is on more sites: 284,348 against 44,884 for vanilla-lazyload, about 6.3 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Jarallax and vanilla-lazyload together?
546 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Jarallax or vanilla-lazyload as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.