Home / Technologies / Jekyll vs LiteSpeed Cache
Jekyll vs LiteSpeed Cache: who uses which
LiteSpeed Cache is on more sites: 557,656 against 19,900 for Jekyll, about 28.0 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Jekyll | LiteSpeed Cache |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 6,325 | 255,304 |
| .uk in the UK | 784 | 20,858 |
| .br in Brazil | 87 | 21,432 |
| .pl in Poland | 58 | 20,679 |
| .org on .org | 1,880 | 16,447 |
| .fr in France | 187 | 14,644 |
| .net on .net | 1,340 | 12,770 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 141 | 13,133 |
0 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Jekyll or LiteSpeed Cache?
LiteSpeed Cache is on more sites: 557,656 against 19,900 for Jekyll, about 28.0 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Jekyll and LiteSpeed Cache together?
0 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Jekyll or LiteSpeed Cache as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.