Home / Technologies / Jekyll vs WP Fastest Cache
Jekyll vs WP Fastest Cache: who uses which
WP Fastest Cache is on more sites: 299,890 against 19,900 for Jekyll, about 15.1 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Jekyll | WP Fastest Cache |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 6,325 | 103,916 |
| .de in Germany | 398 | 39,619 |
| .fr in France | 187 | 13,724 |
| .org on .org | 1,880 | 8,230 |
| .it in Italy | 302 | 9,399 |
| .net on .net | 1,340 | 6,735 |
| .ru on .ru | 81 | 7,771 |
| .uk in the UK | 784 | 6,855 |
1 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Jekyll or WP Fastest Cache?
WP Fastest Cache is on more sites: 299,890 against 19,900 for Jekyll, about 15.1 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Jekyll and WP Fastest Cache together?
1 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Jekyll or WP Fastest Cache as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.