Home / Technologies / Jetpack vs LiteSpeed Cache
Jetpack vs LiteSpeed Cache: who uses which
Jetpack is on more sites: 771,866 against 557,656 for LiteSpeed Cache, about 1.4 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Jetpack | LiteSpeed Cache |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 375,355 | 255,304 |
| .org on .org | 38,506 | 16,447 |
| .de in Germany | 40,012 | 8,650 |
| .uk in the UK | 23,597 | 20,858 |
| .fr in France | 25,499 | 14,644 |
| .net on .net | 24,032 | 12,770 |
| .pl in Poland | 9,714 | 20,679 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 15,987 | 13,133 |
32,913 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Jetpack or LiteSpeed Cache?
Jetpack is on more sites: 771,866 against 557,656 for LiteSpeed Cache, about 1.4 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Jetpack and LiteSpeed Cache together?
32,913 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Jetpack or LiteSpeed Cache as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.