Home / Technologies / Jetpack vs W3 Total Cache
Jetpack vs W3 Total Cache: who uses which
Jetpack is on more sites: 771,866 against 353,859 for W3 Total Cache, about 2.2 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Jetpack | W3 Total Cache |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 375,355 | 137,143 |
| .de in Germany | 40,012 | 25,856 |
| .org on .org | 38,506 | 14,367 |
| .fr in France | 25,499 | 10,500 |
| .uk in the UK | 23,597 | 9,005 |
| .net on .net | 24,032 | 7,922 |
| .it in Italy | 17,295 | 13,917 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 15,987 | 8,616 |
26,035 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Jetpack or W3 Total Cache?
Jetpack is on more sites: 771,866 against 353,859 for W3 Total Cache, about 2.2 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Jetpack and W3 Total Cache together?
26,035 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Jetpack or W3 Total Cache as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.