Home / Technologies / Jetpack vs WP Fastest Cache
Jetpack vs WP Fastest Cache: who uses which
Jetpack is on more sites: 771,866 against 299,890 for WP Fastest Cache, about 2.6 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Jetpack | WP Fastest Cache |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 375,355 | 103,916 |
| .de in Germany | 40,012 | 39,619 |
| .org on .org | 38,506 | 8,230 |
| .fr in France | 25,499 | 13,724 |
| .net on .net | 24,032 | 6,735 |
| .uk in the UK | 23,597 | 6,855 |
| .it in Italy | 17,295 | 9,399 |
| .jp in Japan | 16,716 | 6,566 |
17,178 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Jetpack or WP Fastest Cache?
Jetpack is on more sites: 771,866 against 299,890 for WP Fastest Cache, about 2.6 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Jetpack and WP Fastest Cache together?
17,178 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Jetpack or WP Fastest Cache as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.