Home / Technologies / Jetpack vs WP Super Cache
Jetpack vs WP Super Cache: who uses which
Jetpack is on more sites: 771,866 against 290,330 for WP Super Cache, about 2.7 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Jetpack | WP Super Cache |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 375,355 | 103,355 |
| .de in Germany | 40,012 | 21,667 |
| .org on .org | 38,506 | 14,864 |
| .fr in France | 25,499 | 17,086 |
| .net on .net | 24,032 | 6,694 |
| .uk in the UK | 23,597 | 5,997 |
| .it in Italy | 17,295 | 6,633 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 15,987 | 6,885 |
24,198 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Jetpack or WP Super Cache?
Jetpack is on more sites: 771,866 against 290,330 for WP Super Cache, about 2.7 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Jetpack and WP Super Cache together?
24,198 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Jetpack or WP Super Cache as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.