Home / Technologies / Joomla vs LiteSpeed Cache
Joomla vs LiteSpeed Cache: who uses which
LiteSpeed Cache is on more sites: 557,656 against 463,862 for Joomla, about 1.2 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Joomla | LiteSpeed Cache |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 94,727 | 255,304 |
| .de in Germany | 80,216 | 8,650 |
| .pl in Poland | 33,723 | 20,679 |
| .ru on .ru | 37,369 | 1,958 |
| .org on .org | 16,607 | 16,447 |
| .it in Italy | 20,778 | 7,920 |
| .uk in the UK | 7,667 | 20,858 |
| .br in Brazil | 4,456 | 21,432 |
75 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Joomla or LiteSpeed Cache?
LiteSpeed Cache is on more sites: 557,656 against 463,862 for Joomla, about 1.2 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Joomla and LiteSpeed Cache together?
75 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Joomla or LiteSpeed Cache as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.