Home / Technologies / Joomla vs W3 Total Cache
Joomla vs W3 Total Cache: who uses which
Joomla is on more sites: 463,862 against 353,859 for W3 Total Cache, about 1.3 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Joomla | W3 Total Cache |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 94,727 | 137,143 |
| .de in Germany | 80,216 | 25,856 |
| .ru on .ru | 37,369 | 7,722 |
| .pl in Poland | 33,723 | 8,404 |
| .it in Italy | 20,778 | 13,917 |
| .org on .org | 16,607 | 14,367 |
| .fr in France | 11,217 | 10,500 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 10,799 | 8,616 |
45 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Joomla or W3 Total Cache?
Joomla is on more sites: 463,862 against 353,859 for W3 Total Cache, about 1.3 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Joomla and W3 Total Cache together?
45 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Joomla or W3 Total Cache as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.