Home / Technologies / jQuery Easing vs Socket.IO
jQuery Easing vs Socket.IO: who uses which
jQuery Easing is on more sites: 1,149,070 against 11,013 for Socket.IO, about 104.3 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | jQuery Easing | Socket.IO |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 453,070 | 4,748 |
| .de in Germany | 70,161 | 137 |
| .jp in Japan | 52,613 | 39 |
| .ru on .ru | 46,734 | 285 |
| .org on .org | 45,589 | 376 |
| .it in Italy | 42,702 | 86 |
| .fr in France | 29,761 | 96 |
| .net on .net | 26,541 | 558 |
160 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, jQuery Easing or Socket.IO?
jQuery Easing is on more sites: 1,149,070 against 11,013 for Socket.IO, about 104.3 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use jQuery Easing and Socket.IO together?
160 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using jQuery Easing or Socket.IO as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.