Home / Technologies / jQuery Easing vs vanilla-lazyload
jQuery Easing vs vanilla-lazyload: who uses which
jQuery Easing is on more sites: 1,149,070 against 44,884 for vanilla-lazyload, about 25.6 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | jQuery Easing | vanilla-lazyload |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 453,070 | 20,712 |
| .de in Germany | 70,161 | 885 |
| .jp in Japan | 52,613 | 212 |
| .ru on .ru | 46,734 | 3,400 |
| .org on .org | 45,589 | 986 |
| .it in Italy | 42,702 | 504 |
| .fr in France | 29,761 | 740 |
| .net on .net | 26,541 | 954 |
1,694 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, jQuery Easing or vanilla-lazyload?
jQuery Easing is on more sites: 1,149,070 against 44,884 for vanilla-lazyload, about 25.6 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use jQuery Easing and vanilla-lazyload together?
1,694 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using jQuery Easing or vanilla-lazyload as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.