Home / Technologies / jQuery Migrate vs Slick
jQuery Migrate vs Slick: who uses which
jQuery Migrate is on more sites: 10,479,781 against 1,811,047 for Slick, about 5.8 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | jQuery Migrate | Slick |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 4,393,843 | 795,050 |
| .de in Germany | 758,077 | 67,754 |
| .org on .org | 464,402 | 61,699 |
| .fr in France | 315,453 | 42,709 |
| .uk in the UK | 291,468 | 49,954 |
| .it in Italy | 287,185 | 32,741 |
| .net on .net | 243,800 | 42,812 |
| .jp in Japan | 182,227 | 94,724 |
977,641 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, jQuery Migrate or Slick?
jQuery Migrate is on more sites: 10,479,781 against 1,811,047 for Slick, about 5.8 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use jQuery Migrate and Slick together?
977,641 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using jQuery Migrate or Slick as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.