Home / Technologies / jQuery Migrate vs Underscore.js
jQuery Migrate vs Underscore.js: who uses which
jQuery Migrate is on more sites: 10,479,781 against 1,226,291 for Underscore.js, about 8.5 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | jQuery Migrate | Underscore.js |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 4,393,843 | 529,209 |
| .de in Germany | 758,077 | 73,489 |
| .org on .org | 464,402 | 55,195 |
| .fr in France | 315,453 | 36,310 |
| .uk in the UK | 291,468 | 34,026 |
| .it in Italy | 287,185 | 35,400 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 243,459 | 25,391 |
| .net on .net | 243,800 | 22,013 |
1,107,623 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, jQuery Migrate or Underscore.js?
jQuery Migrate is on more sites: 10,479,781 against 1,226,291 for Underscore.js, about 8.5 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use jQuery Migrate and Underscore.js together?
1,107,623 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using jQuery Migrate or Underscore.js as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.