Home / Technologies / jQuery Migrate vs vanilla-lazyload
jQuery Migrate vs vanilla-lazyload: who uses which
jQuery Migrate is on more sites: 10,479,781 against 44,884 for vanilla-lazyload, about 233.5 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | jQuery Migrate | vanilla-lazyload |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 4,393,843 | 20,712 |
| .de in Germany | 758,077 | 885 |
| .org on .org | 464,402 | 986 |
| .fr in France | 315,453 | 740 |
| .uk in the UK | 291,468 | 957 |
| .it in Italy | 287,185 | 504 |
| .net on .net | 243,800 | 954 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 243,459 | 841 |
14,974 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, jQuery Migrate or vanilla-lazyload?
jQuery Migrate is on more sites: 10,479,781 against 44,884 for vanilla-lazyload, about 233.5 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use jQuery Migrate and vanilla-lazyload together?
14,974 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using jQuery Migrate or vanilla-lazyload as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.