Home / Technologies / jQuery Mobile vs vanilla-lazyload
jQuery Mobile vs vanilla-lazyload: who uses which
vanilla-lazyload is on more sites: 44,884 against 38,396 for jQuery Mobile, about 1.2 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | jQuery Mobile | vanilla-lazyload |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 13,681 | 20,712 |
| .ru on .ru | 870 | 3,400 |
| .de in Germany | 3,157 | 885 |
| .org on .org | 2,942 | 986 |
| .net on .net | 979 | 954 |
| .it in Italy | 1,375 | 504 |
| .fr in France | 1,132 | 740 |
| .uk in the UK | 882 | 957 |
47 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, jQuery Mobile or vanilla-lazyload?
vanilla-lazyload is on more sites: 44,884 against 38,396 for jQuery Mobile, about 1.2 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use jQuery Mobile and vanilla-lazyload together?
47 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using jQuery Mobile or vanilla-lazyload as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.