Home / Technologies / jQuery UI vs vanilla-lazyload
jQuery UI vs vanilla-lazyload: who uses which
jQuery UI is on more sites: 5,327,111 against 44,884 for vanilla-lazyload, about 118.7 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | jQuery UI | vanilla-lazyload |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 2,200,536 | 20,712 |
| .de in Germany | 344,648 | 885 |
| .org on .org | 224,700 | 986 |
| .fr in France | 166,965 | 740 |
| .it in Italy | 153,652 | 504 |
| .uk in the UK | 135,487 | 957 |
| .ru on .ru | 121,018 | 3,400 |
| .br in Brazil | 110,601 | 303 |
10,102 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, jQuery UI or vanilla-lazyload?
jQuery UI is on more sites: 5,327,111 against 44,884 for vanilla-lazyload, about 118.7 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use jQuery UI and vanilla-lazyload together?
10,102 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using jQuery UI or vanilla-lazyload as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.