Home / Technologies / jQuery vs vanilla-lazyload
jQuery vs vanilla-lazyload: who uses which
jQuery is on more sites: 19,504,289 against 44,884 for vanilla-lazyload, about 434.5 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | jQuery | vanilla-lazyload |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 8,335,629 | 20,712 |
| .de in Germany | 1,246,645 | 885 |
| .org on .org | 772,509 | 986 |
| .ru on .ru | 605,078 | 3,400 |
| .uk in the UK | 500,804 | 957 |
| .net on .net | 487,094 | 954 |
| .fr in France | 480,391 | 740 |
| .jp in Japan | 451,087 | 212 |
39,721 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, jQuery or vanilla-lazyload?
jQuery is on more sites: 19,504,289 against 44,884 for vanilla-lazyload, about 434.5 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use jQuery and vanilla-lazyload together?
39,721 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using jQuery or vanilla-lazyload as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.