Home / Technologies / JW Player vs Video.js
JW Player vs Video.js: who uses which
Video.js is on more sites: 127,401 against 22,722 for JW Player, about 5.6 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | JW Player | Video.js |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 9,731 | 66,150 |
| .cn on .cn | 385 | 7,215 |
| .org on .org | 1,616 | 5,875 |
| .de in Germany | 982 | 5,908 |
| .net on .net | 855 | 3,528 |
| .fr in France | 952 | 2,016 |
| .it in Italy | 452 | 2,198 |
| .ru on .ru | 641 | 1,858 |
747 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, JW Player or Video.js?
Video.js is on more sites: 127,401 against 22,722 for JW Player, about 5.6 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use JW Player and Video.js together?
747 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using JW Player or Video.js as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.