Home / Technologies / KaTeX vs vanilla-lazyload
KaTeX vs vanilla-lazyload: who uses which
vanilla-lazyload is on more sites: 44,884 against 15,374 for KaTeX, about 2.9 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | KaTeX | vanilla-lazyload |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 5,072 | 20,712 |
| .ru on .ru | 482 | 3,400 |
| .org on .org | 947 | 986 |
| .net on .net | 472 | 954 |
| .io on .io | 1,305 | 113 |
| .de in Germany | 300 | 885 |
| .uk in the UK | 75 | 957 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 53 | 841 |
97 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, KaTeX or vanilla-lazyload?
vanilla-lazyload is on more sites: 44,884 against 15,374 for KaTeX, about 2.9 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use KaTeX and vanilla-lazyload together?
97 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using KaTeX or vanilla-lazyload as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.