Home / Technologies / lazysizes vs jQuery matchHeight
lazysizes vs jQuery matchHeight: who uses which
lazysizes is on more sites: 932,496 against 254,930 for jQuery matchHeight, about 3.7 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | lazysizes | jQuery matchHeight |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 472,701 | 99,552 |
| .de in Germany | 50,865 | 11,938 |
| .jp in Japan | 35,838 | 20,519 |
| .ru on .ru | 34,044 | 7,867 |
| .org on .org | 25,003 | 10,149 |
| .uk in the UK | 22,214 | 7,667 |
| .net on .net | 22,755 | 6,525 |
| .it in Italy | 14,575 | 8,286 |
9,303 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, lazysizes or jQuery matchHeight?
lazysizes is on more sites: 932,496 against 254,930 for jQuery matchHeight, about 3.7 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use lazysizes and jQuery matchHeight together?
9,303 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using lazysizes or jQuery matchHeight as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.