Home / Technologies / lazysizes vs Socket.IO
lazysizes vs Socket.IO: who uses which
lazysizes is on more sites: 932,496 against 11,013 for Socket.IO, about 84.7 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | lazysizes | Socket.IO |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 472,701 | 4,748 |
| .de in Germany | 50,865 | 137 |
| .jp in Japan | 35,838 | 39 |
| .ru on .ru | 34,044 | 285 |
| .org on .org | 25,003 | 376 |
| .net on .net | 22,755 | 558 |
| .uk in the UK | 22,214 | 68 |
| .br in Brazil | 17,054 | 740 |
351 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, lazysizes or Socket.IO?
lazysizes is on more sites: 932,496 against 11,013 for Socket.IO, about 84.7 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use lazysizes and Socket.IO together?
351 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using lazysizes or Socket.IO as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.