Home / Technologies / lazysizes vs Underscore.js
lazysizes vs Underscore.js: who uses which
Underscore.js is on more sites: 1,226,291 against 932,496 for lazysizes, about 1.3 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | lazysizes | Underscore.js |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 472,701 | 529,209 |
| .de in Germany | 50,865 | 73,489 |
| .org on .org | 25,003 | 55,195 |
| .uk in the UK | 22,214 | 34,026 |
| .ru on .ru | 34,044 | 19,026 |
| .fr in France | 15,629 | 36,310 |
| .it in Italy | 14,575 | 35,400 |
| .net on .net | 22,755 | 22,013 |
40,883 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, lazysizes or Underscore.js?
Underscore.js is on more sites: 1,226,291 against 932,496 for lazysizes, about 1.3 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use lazysizes and Underscore.js together?
40,883 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using lazysizes or Underscore.js as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.