Home / Technologies / Liferay vs LiteSpeed Cache
Liferay vs LiteSpeed Cache: who uses which
LiteSpeed Cache is on more sites: 557,656 against 9,225 for Liferay, about 60.5 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Liferay | LiteSpeed Cache |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 1,414 | 255,304 |
| .br in Brazil | 233 | 21,432 |
| .pl in Poland | 743 | 20,679 |
| .uk in the UK | 68 | 20,858 |
| .org on .org | 397 | 16,447 |
| .fr in France | 170 | 14,644 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 128 | 13,133 |
| .net on .net | 75 | 12,770 |
0 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Liferay or LiteSpeed Cache?
LiteSpeed Cache is on more sites: 557,656 against 9,225 for Liferay, about 60.5 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Liferay and LiteSpeed Cache together?
0 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Liferay or LiteSpeed Cache as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.