Home / Technologies / Liferay vs W3 Total Cache
Liferay vs W3 Total Cache: who uses which
W3 Total Cache is on more sites: 353,859 against 9,225 for Liferay, about 38.4 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Liferay | W3 Total Cache |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 1,414 | 137,143 |
| .de in Germany | 872 | 25,856 |
| .org on .org | 397 | 14,367 |
| .it in Italy | 700 | 13,917 |
| .fr in France | 170 | 10,500 |
| .dk in Denmark | 6 | 10,422 |
| .pl in Poland | 743 | 8,404 |
| .uk in the UK | 68 | 9,005 |
1 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Liferay or W3 Total Cache?
W3 Total Cache is on more sites: 353,859 against 9,225 for Liferay, about 38.4 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Liferay and W3 Total Cache together?
1 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Liferay or W3 Total Cache as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.