Home / Technologies / Liferay vs WP Super Cache
Liferay vs WP Super Cache: who uses which
WP Super Cache is on more sites: 290,330 against 9,225 for Liferay, about 31.5 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Liferay | WP Super Cache |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 1,414 | 103,355 |
| .de in Germany | 872 | 21,667 |
| .fr in France | 170 | 17,086 |
| .org on .org | 397 | 14,864 |
| .ru on .ru | 64 | 12,192 |
| .ch in Switzerland | 54 | 12,193 |
| .it in Italy | 700 | 6,633 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 128 | 6,885 |
0 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Liferay or WP Super Cache?
WP Super Cache is on more sites: 290,330 against 9,225 for Liferay, about 31.5 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Liferay and WP Super Cache together?
0 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Liferay or WP Super Cache as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.