Home / Technologies / Lightbox2 vs vanilla-lazyload
Lightbox2 vs vanilla-lazyload: who uses which
Lightbox2 is on more sites: 112,216 against 44,884 for vanilla-lazyload, about 2.5 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Lightbox2 | vanilla-lazyload |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 43,963 | 20,712 |
| .de in Germany | 7,422 | 885 |
| .ru on .ru | 3,168 | 3,400 |
| .jp in Japan | 4,810 | 212 |
| .org on .org | 3,629 | 986 |
| .uk in the UK | 2,752 | 957 |
| .pl in Poland | 2,948 | 456 |
| .net on .net | 2,437 | 954 |
232 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Lightbox2 or vanilla-lazyload?
Lightbox2 is on more sites: 112,216 against 44,884 for vanilla-lazyload, about 2.5 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Lightbox2 and vanilla-lazyload together?
232 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Lightbox2 or vanilla-lazyload as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.