Home / Technologies / LiteSpeed Cache vs Magnolia CMS
LiteSpeed Cache vs Magnolia CMS: who uses which
LiteSpeed Cache is on more sites: 557,656 against 3,253 for Magnolia CMS, about 171.4 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | LiteSpeed Cache | Magnolia CMS |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 255,304 | 795 |
| .br in Brazil | 21,432 | 13 |
| .uk in the UK | 20,858 | 29 |
| .pl in Poland | 20,679 | 30 |
| .org on .org | 16,447 | 57 |
| .fr in France | 14,644 | 28 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 13,133 | 41 |
| .net on .net | 12,770 | 21 |
0 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, LiteSpeed Cache or Magnolia CMS?
LiteSpeed Cache is on more sites: 557,656 against 3,253 for Magnolia CMS, about 171.4 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use LiteSpeed Cache and Magnolia CMS together?
0 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using LiteSpeed Cache or Magnolia CMS as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.