Home / Technologies / LiteSpeed Cache vs MediaWiki
LiteSpeed Cache vs MediaWiki: who uses which
LiteSpeed Cache is on more sites: 557,656 against 15,820 for MediaWiki, about 35.3 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | LiteSpeed Cache | MediaWiki |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 255,304 | 7,036 |
| .br in Brazil | 21,432 | 82 |
| .uk in the UK | 20,858 | 142 |
| .pl in Poland | 20,679 | 105 |
| .org on .org | 16,447 | 2,932 |
| .fr in France | 14,644 | 192 |
| .net on .net | 12,770 | 730 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 13,133 | 174 |
0 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, LiteSpeed Cache or MediaWiki?
LiteSpeed Cache is on more sites: 557,656 against 15,820 for MediaWiki, about 35.3 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use LiteSpeed Cache and MediaWiki together?
0 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using LiteSpeed Cache or MediaWiki as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.