Home / Technologies / LiteSpeed Cache vs MonsterInsights
LiteSpeed Cache vs MonsterInsights: who uses which
MonsterInsights is on more sites: 729,817 against 557,656 for LiteSpeed Cache, about 1.3 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | LiteSpeed Cache | MonsterInsights |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 255,304 | 352,476 |
| .org on .org | 16,447 | 38,363 |
| .uk in the UK | 20,858 | 24,461 |
| .fr in France | 14,644 | 21,029 |
| .pl in Poland | 20,679 | 12,302 |
| .br in Brazil | 21,432 | 8,980 |
| .net on .net | 12,770 | 16,926 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 13,133 | 16,325 |
24,301 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, LiteSpeed Cache or MonsterInsights?
MonsterInsights is on more sites: 729,817 against 557,656 for LiteSpeed Cache, about 1.3 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use LiteSpeed Cache and MonsterInsights together?
24,301 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using LiteSpeed Cache or MonsterInsights as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.