Home / Technologies / LiteSpeed Cache vs Ninja Forms
LiteSpeed Cache vs Ninja Forms: who uses which
LiteSpeed Cache is on more sites: 557,656 against 44,709 for Ninja Forms, about 12.5 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | LiteSpeed Cache | Ninja Forms |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 255,304 | 20,637 |
| .uk in the UK | 20,858 | 2,248 |
| .br in Brazil | 21,432 | 340 |
| .pl in Poland | 20,679 | 395 |
| .org on .org | 16,447 | 1,957 |
| .fr in France | 14,644 | 1,679 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 13,133 | 1,130 |
| .net on .net | 12,770 | 732 |
1,693 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, LiteSpeed Cache or Ninja Forms?
LiteSpeed Cache is on more sites: 557,656 against 44,709 for Ninja Forms, about 12.5 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use LiteSpeed Cache and Ninja Forms together?
1,693 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using LiteSpeed Cache or Ninja Forms as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.