Home / Technologies / LiteSpeed Cache vs OceanWP
LiteSpeed Cache vs OceanWP: who uses which
LiteSpeed Cache is on more sites: 557,656 against 196,239 for OceanWP, about 2.8 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | LiteSpeed Cache | OceanWP |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 255,304 | 70,839 |
| .de in Germany | 8,650 | 27,953 |
| .fr in France | 14,644 | 13,114 |
| .pl in Poland | 20,679 | 6,969 |
| .br in Brazil | 21,432 | 3,840 |
| .uk in the UK | 20,858 | 4,045 |
| .org on .org | 16,447 | 6,765 |
| .net on .net | 12,770 | 3,194 |
8,932 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, LiteSpeed Cache or OceanWP?
LiteSpeed Cache is on more sites: 557,656 against 196,239 for OceanWP, about 2.8 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use LiteSpeed Cache and OceanWP together?
8,932 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using LiteSpeed Cache or OceanWP as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.