Home / Technologies / LiteSpeed Cache vs Polylang
LiteSpeed Cache vs Polylang: who uses which
LiteSpeed Cache is on more sites: 557,659 against 13,200 for Polylang, about 42.2 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | LiteSpeed Cache | Polylang |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 255,306 | 5,064 |
| .br in Brazil | 21,432 | 86 |
| .pl in Poland | 20,679 | 474 |
| .uk in the UK | 20,858 | 26 |
| .org on .org | 16,447 | 335 |
| .fr in France | 14,644 | 211 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 13,133 | 125 |
| .net on .net | 12,770 | 253 |
594 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, LiteSpeed Cache or Polylang?
LiteSpeed Cache is on more sites: 557,659 against 13,200 for Polylang, about 42.2 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use LiteSpeed Cache and Polylang together?
594 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Join the waitlist to download every site using LiteSpeed Cache or Polylang as a spreadsheet and hear when new ones appear.